Classical fencing

Classical fencing, often abbreviated as "CF", is a"to give and not to receive" a touch, and some
way to distinguish one branch of traditional fencingschools emphasize the character-building, "martial
from modern "sport" or Olympic fencing. It isart" aspects of practice. For CF practitioners not
described by the International Masters at Armsinterested in tournaments, "winning" is seen as the
Federation (IMAF): "The second half of the 19thresult of excellence, not its definition. Martial wins
Century is historically the classical period, in whichare generally achieved by defensive prowess as
the art of fencing reached its furthestmany CF torunaments are scored based upon hits
development, but we may include the whole ofagainst. As such the fencer with the least hits is
the 19th century in this era, as this was the agethe winner. Seeding and promotion from round to
when fencing was formally codified, systematized,round is solely determined by lack of hits against.
and fully expressed in complete systems andThis contrasts with sport fencing, which is
styles.completely results oriented, and winning is seen as
'Classical,' in this sense, means 'the golden age,' thethe proof and definition of excellence. The winning
period when the art saw its highest peak." Weand seeding is based upon those who have given
get a sense of the 'ideal' Classical fencer fromthe greatest number of hits. In seeding from
19th Century contemporary and fencing Master,pools to direct elimination rounds, seeding
Louis Rondelle: "A classical fencer is supposed toindicators are effected by both the number of
be one who observes a fine position, whosehits given and received. Such competitive wins,
attacks are fully developed, whose hits areespecially in direct elimination rounds where
marvelously accurate, his parries firm and hisindicators no longer effect promotion, may often
ripostes executed with precision. One must notbe achieved with both fencers being hit, the
forget that this regularity is not possible unless thewinner having only hit shortly before the loser.
adversary is a party to it. It is a conventionalWeapons Classical Fencing uses the three modern
bout, which consists of parries, attacks, andweapons Foil, Epee and Sabre, as well as historical
returns, all rhyming together." The essence of CFweapons such as the rapier and dagger.
is that one fences in a martially accurate mannerCritiques of Classical and Sport Fencing Many
with the weapons used (with different schoolsclassical fencing advocates, believe that the
selecting different weapons in addition to the 19thcurrent sport of fencing has lost meaningful
Century counterparts of the modern foil, epee,connections with its origin as a martial art. They
and sabre). Emphasis is placed on training as if forfeel that the sport as it is practiced in the Olympic
a real encounter with sharp blade - "to hit and notGames and in fencing's sponsoring organizations
be hit". It should also be noted that while Classical(the FIE or the United States Fencing Association,
Fencing is a term which was used and defined infor instance) is stylized and unrealistic, and often
the 19th Century, it has been misappropriated inno longer resembles any actual combat with live
recent years to mean everything from early 20thweaponry. They believe that tactics like the flick
Century sport fencing to 17th Century rapierthat are enabled by fencing's modern scoring
fencing.system detract from realism. They believe that
The three standard fencing weapons, foil, epeesports fencing has philosophy geared towards
and sabre, are used, though in a slightly differentwinning a maximum number of victories as soon
manner than in sport fencing. CF also uses sideas possible rather than a philosophy that demands
judges to determine if touches land, rather thanmastery of martial, and therefore defensive,
the electrical scoring system used in sport fencing.techniques, tactics and strategies.
Some classical schools also incorporate earlierIn contrast, the sport fencing world mostly
weapons such as the smallsword, rapier andignores the much smaller classical fencing
dagger and singlestick, however, only in so far asmovement, or points to the unwillingness of its
they were taught during the Classical era. Studymembers to compete - even in epee, which has
of the weapons and techniques of fencing prior tofew conventions to favor one style or the other.
the 19th Century is properly termed HistoricalSport fencers also point to stylized and unrealistic
fencing. There are teachers of both the Frenchcomponents in CF, such as the extreme emphasis
School and the Italian School who continue in thein some CF schools on "proper form". A perennial
classical tradition.conflict stems from rules on priority of attack in
After the second world war, duels, already inthe conventional weapons. CF form requirements
decline, went out of use in Europe, and classicalin the conventional weapons of foil and sabre
fencing as a training for a real fight disappeared.require a fully extended weapon arm to gain the
Fencing continued as a martial sport like boxing orpriority of the attack. Sport fencing, on the other
karate, with tournaments and championshipshand, has changed its rules to recognize an
including the Olympic Games where it was one ofextending arm as sufficient. In some ways, the
the original events. With the advent of theSport Fencing approach more accurately
electrical scoring apparatus, which replaced therepresents the probable technique in a martial
previous system of using four judges to see if aencounter, where the fencer is trying to conceal
touch landed, a minority of fencers felt thathis actions. On the other hand, the conventional
fencing had become increasingly stylized and lessweapons having been training weapons, the rule
like a real duel. Classical fencers feel that in sportof full extension was more to teach fencers at
fencing being hit is acceptable, as long as youthe early stages that it is important to make
amass enough points to win, with less emphasisattacks from positions of safety to maximize
on not being hit at all. There are CF tournaments,their chances of 'hitting without being hit'.
which use scoring rules similar to sport fencing.Both CF and Sport Fencers recognize this when
Fencing masters and students who rejectedfencing Epee, the most realistic weapon in
modern fencing either preserved their tradition,common. Epee fencers take defensive (en guard)
abandoned it in favor of employment as fencingposition with a much more extended arm,
masters in modern style, or retired.however, an epee fencer may disguise his attack
Today, CF has small groups of practitioners inby removing his arm to lure an action and then
France, Italy, England and the US. It should becounter attacking.
mentioned that the overwhelming majority ofSport fencers also challenge the credibility and
fencing masters and fencers enthusiasticallyqualifications of CF fencing masters. Many sport
adopted the new conventions and electronicallyfencers feel that until a CF practitioner achieves a
scored fencing, which were designed by fencingreputation by showing skill in competitive
masters and other members of the fencingsituations, their claims against sport fencing will be
establishment. For these fencers, electrical scoringdismissed as "sour grapes" by that community.
is a vast improvement over "dry" visual judging,This is problematic as neither side endorses the
which was notably subject to bias and thescoring and judging conventions used by the
inherent difficulty of judging fast fencing actions.other.
For the majority of fencers, the conventions ofOn the other hand, many Traditional Masters who
CF are equally stylized and unrealistic.can trace their training directly back to 19th
Classical Fencing is not SCA fencing, nor is it SportCentury Masters, or further, do not feel the need
Fencing. There is disagreement about whether orto validate their titles under the competitive
not it is Historical fencing, with analysis by theregime. Due to the disparity between the
CFML moderator at http://principles they teach and those required for
sports.groups.yahoo.com/group/ classicalfencingproducing an Olympic champion, such validation is
message/7829 asserting that it is simplistic to callfelt as meaningless for their practice.
CF "clean" or "proper" fencing. In addition, a vocalThis conflict does not seem to be going away.
and prolific author and fencing master also calledSome classical fencing thinkers believe that the
his style of early 20th Century competativesolution is to try to reclaim the sport of fencing
fencing 'classical' to differentiate it from modernfor classical traditions - which seems unlikely
competitive fencing.considering its minority status and unfortunate
This caused much confusion, until this masterexpressions of contempt for the competitive
published an article in which he definitivelyfencers by some vocal individuals. Others think
separated his practice from the traditionalthat classical fencing should separate from the
'Classical' schools of fencing prior to the 20thexisting sport fencing structure to form its own
Century. Nonetheless, for many in CF, its goal isworld.